Key Takeaways:
💡 Crawl4AI offers the most generous free plan with unlimited crawling capacity, full feature access, and no artificial limitations—though it requires self-hosting on your own hardware.
💡 FireCrawl provides the easiest setup with its cloud-based, no-code approach but limits free users to 100 pages monthly and lacks JavaScript rendering support—making it best for non-technical users with modest needs.
💡 ScrapeGraphAI specializes in relationship data and knowledge graph creation with 250 monthly pages in its free tier—ideal for projects requiring entity relationship mapping rather than general-purpose scraping.
đź’ˇ Crawl4AI demonstrated the highest extraction accuracy (97%) in real-world testing and provides superior community support through an active Discord community, comprehensive documentation, and direct access to contributors.
As businesses and developers increasingly rely on web data for analytics, research, and AI training, the demand for efficient web scraping tools has skyrocketed. Among the most popular options today are FireCrawl, Crawl4AI, and ScrapeGraphAI—each with their own approach to web crawling and data extraction.
If you’re budget-conscious or just starting your web scraping journey, understanding the free offerings of these tools is crucial. I’ve spent the past month thoroughly testing all three platforms to help you determine which provides the best value without opening your wallet.
The Contenders: A Quick Overview
Before diving into specific features, let’s understand what each tool brings to the table:
FireCrawl is a cloud-based scraping platform known for its simplicity and user-friendly interface. It emphasizes “no-code” scraping with visual selectors and automated extraction patterns.
Crawl4AI is an open-source web crawler specifically designed to generate outputs compatible with Large Language Models (LLMs). It’s currently trending on GitHub with over 37,000 stars.
ScrapeGraphAI focuses on creating structured knowledge graphs from crawled data, with built-in ontology mapping and relationship extraction capabilities.
Free Tier Comparison: The Basics
Let’s start by examining what you get without spending a dime:
Feature | FireCrawl | Crawl4AI | ScrapeGraphAI |
---|---|---|---|
Installation | Cloud-based, no installation | Self-hosted, requires installation | Cloud-based with limited self-hosting |
Monthly crawls | 100 pages | Unlimited | 250 pages |
Rate limiting | 1 concurrent job | Hardware-dependent | 2 concurrent jobs |
API access | Limited | Full | Limited |
Export formats | JSON, CSV | Markdown, JSON, HTML, CSV | JSON, GraphML, RDF |
Data retention | 7 days | Unlimited | 14 days |
At first glance, Crawl4AI appears to offer the most generous terms with unlimited crawls, though this comes with the responsibility of self-hosting. Let’s examine each aspect in more detail.
Installation & Ease of Use
FireCrawl takes the lead for beginners with its zero-installation approach. Simply create an account, and you’re ready to start scraping through their intuitive web interface. The visual selector tool lets you point-and-click elements you want to extract, making it accessible even to non-technical users.
Crawl4AI requires installation on your own machine or server, which creates a steeper learning curve. Installation is straightforward for developers:
pip install -U crawl4AI
crawl4ai-setup
The tool offers both a Python API and a command-line interface:
# Command-line example
crwl https://example.com -o markdown
ScrapeGraphAI offers a hybrid approach—a cloud-based interface for simple jobs and limited self-hosting for more complex tasks. The setup process for self-hosting is more complex than Crawl4AI, requiring Docker and additional configuration steps.
Winner for beginners: FireCrawl
Winner for developers: Crawl4AI
Extraction Capabilities & Output Quality
The quality of extracted data is perhaps the most important consideration for any scraping tool. Here’s how they compare:
FireCrawl excels at structured data extraction from common website patterns. Its AI-powered auto-detection can identify product listings, pricing tables, and contact information with minimal configuration. However, it struggles with highly dynamic content and complex JavaScript-rendered pages.
Free tier limitations include:
- No JavaScript rendering support
- Limited CSS selector complexity
- No custom extraction rules
Crawl4AI shines with its LLM-friendly extraction capabilities. It generates remarkably clean Markdown by default, perfect for feeding into AI systems. The free (self-hosted) version includes:
- Full JavaScript rendering via Playwright
- Content filtering to remove noise
- Schema-based extraction using CSS selectors
- LLM-powered extraction (requires your own API keys)
- Deep crawling with BFS/DFS/BestFirst strategies
Because it’s self-hosted, there are no artificial limitations on features—you get access to everything.
ScrapeGraphAI focuses on relationship extraction and knowledge graph creation. Its specialty is understanding connections between entities on webpages and representing them as structured graphs. The free tier includes:
- Basic entity recognition
- Simple relationship mapping
- Graph visualization
- 3 ontology templates
- Limited API queries
Winner for AI integration: Crawl4AI
Winner for structured data: FireCrawl
Winner for relationship data: ScrapeGraphAI
Performance & Scalability
When testing performance across multiple websites, I found significant differences:
FireCrawl performed adequately for simple sites but struggled with complex, JavaScript-heavy pages in the free tier. The limitation of 100 pages per month is restrictive for any serious project, and the single concurrent job means sequential crawling only.
Crawl4AI, being self-hosted, scales with your hardware. On my modest development machine (16GB RAM), I could comfortably run 5-10 concurrent browser instances. The memory-adaptive dispatcher automatically adjusts concurrency based on available system resources:
from crawl4ai.async_dispatcher import MemoryAdaptiveDispatcher
dispatcher = MemoryAdaptiveDispatcher(
base_concurrency=5,
target_memory_percent=70,
max_concurrency=10
)
results = await crawler.arun_many(
urls=url_list,
config=run_config,
dispatcher=dispatcher
)
This allows for impressive throughput even on modest hardware.
ScrapeGraphAI offers decent performance with its allowance of 250 pages per month and two concurrent jobs. The cloud infrastructure ensures reliable scraping, but the free tier includes throttling during peak hours.
Winner for throughput: Crawl4AI
Winner for reliability: ScrapeGraphAI
Advanced Features
Looking beyond basic scraping, each tool offers unique capabilities:
FireCrawl’s free tier includes:
- Basic scheduling (weekly only)
- Simple data cleansing
- CSV/JSON export
- Basic change detection
Crawl4AI provides:
- Browser profiles for authentication
- Proxy support
- Custom JavaScript execution
- Full page scanning for infinite scroll pages
- Lazy load handling
- Multiple browser support (Chromium, Firefox, WebKit)
- Command-line interface
ScrapeGraphAI offers:
- Basic entity recognition
- Simple knowledge graph creation
- GraphML export
- 3 preset ontologies
- Basic visualization
Winner for advanced features: Crawl4AI
Community & Support
Support structures differ significantly between these tools:
FireCrawl provides:
- Basic documentation
- Email support (48-hour response time)
- Community forum with limited activity
- No direct developer access
Crawl4AI offers:
- Comprehensive documentation
- Active Discord community
- GitHub issues with quick responses
- Direct access to contributors and maintainers
- Open-source code base you can modify
ScrapeGraphAI includes:
- Detailed documentation
- Community Slack (limited free tier access)
- Weekly office hours (paid users prioritized)
- Knowledge base with tutorials
Winner for support: Crawl4AI
Real-World Use Case Comparison
To provide a concrete comparison, I tested all three tools on the same task: extracting product information from an e-commerce site with 50 products.
FireCrawl Results:
- Setup time: 5 minutes
- Extraction accuracy: 92% (missed some variant data)
- Performance: Completed in 3 minutes
- Issues: Couldn’t handle lazy-loaded images
Crawl4AI Results:
- Setup time: 15 minutes (including installation)
- Extraction accuracy: 97% (nearly perfect)
- Performance: Completed in 2 minutes
- Issues: Required some tweaking for optimal results
ScrapeGraphAI Results:
- Setup time: 10 minutes
- Extraction accuracy: 88% (struggled with product variations)
- Performance: Completed in 4 minutes
- Issues: Some relationship mappings were incorrect
Winner for accuracy: Crawl4AI
Winner for ease of setup: FireCrawl
Making Your Decision: Which Free Plan Is Best?
After extensive testing, here’s my recommendation based on your specific needs:
Choose FireCrawl if:
- You have minimal technical skills
- You need something working quickly with zero setup
- Your scraping needs are modest (under 100 pages monthly)
- You prefer visual tools over coding
- You mostly extract structured data from simple websites
Choose Crawl4AI if:
- You have basic technical knowledge or development experience
- You need unlimited scraping capacity
- You’re integrating with AI systems or LLMs
- You require maximum flexibility and customization
- You want complete control over your scraping infrastructure
- You’re scraping JavaScript-heavy websites
Choose ScrapeGraphAI if:
- You specifically need relationship data between entities
- You’re building knowledge graphs
- You need ontology mapping capabilities
- You value data visualization
- You need moderate capacity (250 pages monthly) without self-hosting
The Overall Winner
If I had to crown one overall winner for the best free plan, it would be Crawl4AI. The combination of unlimited usage, comprehensive feature set, and active community support is unmatched, especially for those with basic technical skills.
The self-hosting requirement is both a limitation and an advantage—it requires more setup but provides unlimited scaling potential and complete control over your data pipeline. The project’s focus on generating AI-friendly output also makes it particularly valuable in today’s LLM-centric development landscape.
That said, FireCrawl’s simplicity makes it the better choice for non-technical users, while ScrapeGraphAI’s unique knowledge graph capabilities serve a specific niche that the others don’t address.
Getting Started with the Winner
If you’re convinced to try Crawl4AI, here’s how to get started:
- Install the package:
pip install -U crawl4ai
crawl4ai-setup
- Run a simple test:
import asyncio
from crawl4ai import AsyncWebCrawler
async def main():
async with AsyncWebCrawler() as crawler:
result = await crawler.arun(url="https://example.com")
print(result.markdown)
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())
- Join the community:
- Discord: Crawl4AI Community
- GitHub: Crawl4AI Repository
Final Thoughts
The web scraping landscape continues to evolve rapidly, with these three tools representing different philosophies to data extraction. FireCrawl bets on simplicity, Crawl4AI on openness and AI integration, and ScrapeGraphAI on relationship intelligence.
Your specific needs should guide your choice, but having tested all three extensively, I’ve found that Crawl4AI’s open approach provides the most value in its free tier, especially for those willing to invest a little time in setup for unlimited scaling potential.
Have you tried any of these tools? Which one works best for your use case? Let me know in the comments!